One of the most unfortunate facts about living in the world today (and almost any day for the matter) is that a large majority of the world's wealth belongs to a very small percentage of the world. If you are so lucky as to be in that top percentage that does not necessarily mean that this theory doesn't apply to you. In fact, it applies more to the wealthy than the poor. The goal is to create a family who, driven by the ideals of Christianity, can become the greatest philanthropic force ever.
Before I begin, it's important to stress the importance of charity. In addition to alleviating the massive disproportionate distribution of wealth charity is the single most important Christian activity one can participate in outside of Mass. We are called by Jesus to love our neighbors, and we are told that when we clothe and feed them, we are really clothing and feeding him. This act of Agape or self-giving love is tremendously important if we are to live a Christian life. Also, while critics might point out that it is impossible to alleviate the world of hunger, we need to emulate the lives of the Saints like Mother Theresa of Calcutta who despite unbelievable odds stacked against her, used the power of prayer to build her hope which in turn gave her the patience to meet her charitable challenges every day.
While there are many more points that can be used to justify the act of philanthropy, this theory presupposes the reader already agrees with them. I will present the theory then we will talk about why it is true, and then get into the method for achieving it.
Assumption 1: The notional size of philanthropic cash flows over time grows with inflation
Assumption 2: The base family net worth (or that which is not given away to Charity) stays above a critical inflation adjusted amount X where X is equal to the amount of money necessary to sustain a family off the income from a risk free investment for their entire lives.
Theory: The net present value of future philanthropic cash flows from each consecutive generation of a family are greater than any one generation can produce.
The proof for the argument is fairly simple if you've taken an introductory finance class at some point. Because of the assumptions we have made, we can deduce that if the first philanthropic cash flow from the first generation is equal to A, then each consecutive generation will give an amount whose net present value with respect to inflation is greater than or equal to A. Because of this the sum of the net present value of future cash flows for n generations is greater than or equal to A*n. This number has no limit while each i generation is limited in the amount it can give (X + Ai), it goes without saying that there exists a value n where A*n > (X+Ai) for any value of X. Essentially as the generations pass, the value of the total family gift to charity approaches infinity.
Now THAT is a big charitable gift.
Most people don't think about cash flows across generations. Many of us live paycheck to paycheck. That is the income stream that we see. On a micro scale the same theory applies. With each paycheck we eventually (hopefully) save enough money to retire. Retirement doesn't mean we stop earning money but it does mean that we have saved enough money that we can live off of that money for the rest of our lives. Some of us might be so lucky as to have saved enough to live off the income streams from our net worth without actually depleting its value. In addition, no matter who are, as we save more and more, the amount of money we earn by simply keeping our savings in the bank increases over time, so our non-work related income increases. Lastly, if we were to give a percentage of our savings away to charity every paycheck, as our savings grew, so would the size of our charitable gift.
Simply extend this concept to the next generation and add a couple of assumptions and you will quickly see how the theory takes shape. While you might be saying to yourself, "Yeah but…" at this point, you are right to question; however, the method achieving this should assuage any worries you have already.
Method
The unfortunate problem of intergenerational philanthropic giving is the first generation will most likely not see the fruits of their labor. One must truly believe in family in order to put such a plan into action. The theory assumes that you are already of this nature, and that your family will continue endlessly throughout time. This brings me to my first and most important activity, teaching the children the importance of family, and the joy of agape.
Step 1: Raise your family properly
Selfish greed and materialistic influences are hard to avoid, especially in a capitalist environment. If we have done our job well as parents our children will have the tools necessary to fight these influences. The primary tool is faith in God and Jesus who tells us that charity is an act of love not only to our neighbors but also to him. This will then translate into a love for humanity as a whole and this should through the Holy Spirit create a desire to give. The second tool is knowledge. Without knowledge and understanding it will be hard to see how the plan of intergenerational philanthropy works nor will they have critical decision making skills necessary to choose where the cash flows go when it comes time to give. At the center of this knowledge are the studies of Mathematics, Finance, Economics and Geo Socioeconomics. Lastly we need to give our children the tool of hope. Without hope they will be unable to take risks, and unable to truly trust the generations they will not know. If they are truly knowledgeable they will have the ability to earn income off of X greater than inflation through investment. While risky, if well balanced and done intelligently, this should be encouraged for those generations that are capable.
Step 2: Save, save, save
If you are, as I stated in the first paragraph, the lucky few in the top percentage of wealth then step 2 is important, but NOWHERE near as important as it is for those hoping to get up to that level. In order to achieve the value X (the value at which a generation can live comfortably off the income streams from a risk free investment alone), we need to save that much. Depending on where we are on the wealth ladder, this might be impossible in one generation. If we can educate ourselves well enough to generate an income stream large enough to live off of comfortably and save, we can start building our families net worth towards X. This is not a foreign concept except most of us think in terms of retirement not in terms of an intergenerational retirement. For those that cannot reach X within one generation, if we are diligent and have followed Step 1, we can give to our children some of if not all of what we've saved and they will continue the pursuit of X.
Now, one of the tricky points is the value of X changes. Because of inflation, the cost of living for each consecutive generation increases, so the size of the income stream of X which is large enough to sustain a generation needs to grow over time. The only way this is possible is for X to grow faster than inflation. The primary method of this growth will come from the savings of future generations. This is why Step 2 is even important for those who have already reached X. If we have followed Step 1 well, we can hopefully produce a generation who does not need to live off the income stream from X and can add to it. This ideal scenario rapidly increases the size of the family net worth above X as it will grow also from its own compounding interest. But, we need to be aware that anything can happen to our children and we need to provide a source of income for them so they might live without fear. We cannot assume that our children will produce income, otherwise our theory becomes false as eventually, statistics will take over and a generation will require the income stream.
Step 3: Give, give, give
Once you've completed the first two steps and you have reached the family net worth X, first of all, congratulations, you are now very wealthy. Second of all, congratulations, you now have the ability to start giving great amounts to charity. There are two types of generations as we discussed: those that produce income, and those that need the income stream off X. Both of which will be receiving income of the amount Wi + Xi where Wi is the income received from work and Xi is the income received from the family savings. Each generation must use the knowledge given to them in Step 1 to determine three percentages. Whether or not Wi = 0 or not a percentage of income must be given to charity, C, a percentage must be saved, S, and a percentage must be used for living expenses L. C+S+L = 100%. Even if a generation does not have the ability to produce Wi greater than 0, they might be able to decrease their living expenses L to give to charity C and save S. This cannot be assumed, but under the most difficult circumstance where net family value does not increase during a generation or actually decreases due to necessity then the next capable generation must return to step 2 and attempt to return the net family value to X.
Step 4: Community Service
No matter what type of generation we are, we must give to charity in some form or another. Luckily, not all charity is in the form of money. By performing community service we are actually giving to charity through our time and talent as opposed to treasure. While it is hard to put a notional value on this type of giving it is very important and often the most personally rewarding. Whether we are at Step 2 or Step 3, a portion or all of C, the percentage we give to charity, can come from the form of community service. In the world today the power of money is immense and a huge number of lives can be helped through that power; however, lives can be touched on a much more intimate level through community service.
Conclusion
These methods will produce a family which according to the theory above can give to charity an amount never before thought possible. In many ways, this theory comes out of investment theory, but instead of investing our income we are investing our lives and the lives of our children, and their children down the line. It doesn't take long before you realize that the better we are at Step 1 and 2, the faster we can reach step 3 and the greater amount we can give.
In addition, to teaching our children, it doesn't take long to realize that if this is possible, and anyone can do it, teaching others the same methods dramatically increases the amount given to charity. As the number of families actually reaching step 3 increases, the greater poverty and hunger is destroyed. Eventually it is mathematically possible and statistically a fact that if enough people try these methods and teach them we can completely level the distribution of income to a point where everyone can live comfortably. And to those that question whether an even distribution of income sounds socialist; the existence of the rich and the poor does not prove the existence of capitalism, only greed.